Gasless ('MIG') Welding of thin section steel - should I use 0.8mm or 0.9mm wire?
Here's why 0.9mm, rather than 0.8mm, may actually be your best choice for thinner materials
When it comes to 'MIG' welding thinner sections with gasless welding wire - for example 1.6mm sheet or RHS/tube - many welders logically assume that when it comes to choice of wire size, 0.8mm wire will be better than 0.9mm.
Strange as it may seem, this is not necessarily the case. Here's why;
0.8mm Gasless Wire does not directly compare to 0.8mm Solid (gas) MIG Wire:
If you are accustomed to using 0.8mm solid (gas) MIG wire for welding thinner gauge steel, then you might naturally assume that 0.8mm gasless wire is also the best option.
However, 0.8mm Gasless Wire does not directly compare to 0.8mm Solid (gas) Wire. This is because gasless wires are flux-cored, meaning they have a hollow core filled with flux - therefore a gasless wire will have less filler metal per KG than a solid wire of the same size.
For this reason alone, 0.9mm gasless wire will often do the same job as 0.8mm solid wire.... depending on the quality of the wire.
The right 0.9mm Gasless Wire will easily weld thin materials
If you've tried different brands of gasless wire, you'll agree that there is often a significant difference from one to another. This is because the formulation of the flux has a big impact on how the wire performs... and every brand of wire has it's own formula.
A top performing 0.9mm wire, like the Weldclass Platinum GL-11, will be much more "tolerant" to variations in material thicknesses and will easily weld thinner materials.
In fact, Platinum GL-11 is arguably Australia's number 1 gasless wire when it comes to user appeal. The formula of this wire has been perfected over many years to offer exceptional performance... including ability to weld a wide variety of thicknesses using 0.9mm. GL-11 is also tolerant to variations in parameters, which means that you won't have to constantly play with the settings on your welder to make the wire run like it should.
Formulation (of wire & flux)
This one is difficult to explain in a few words... but we'll do our best to make sense!
The formula for 0.8mm gasless wire is not the same as 0.9mm (or shouldn't be). This is because different size wires have different arc characteristics, different operating parameters, etc - and changes need to be made to the formula to accommodate this.
Also, being physically smaller (with less "room" to fit both wire & flux), it is even more difficult to achieve a successful formula for 0.8mm, than it is for 0.9mm.
Our Platinum GL-11 in 0.8mm is also a top-performing wire... but we still sell over 10 times more 0.9mm than we do 0.8mm. Why? because Platinum GL-11 in 0.9mm is so versatile & can be used on both thinner & thicker materials.
Cost benefits when using 0.9mm
Using 0.9mm rather than 0.8mm can save you money too. Per KG, 0.8mm is always more costly than 0.9mm - this is because; a) per KG, smaller diameter wires cost more to manufacture, and b) 0.9mm wire is more popular and manufactured in much larger volumes which helps to reduce the cost.
So when should I use 0.8mm?
We're not saying that 0.8mm gasless wire doesn't have its place. If you are constantly welding very thin materials (say 1.0mm for example), then 0.8mm could make sense.
And/or if you have a smaller MIG welder with maximum capacity of say 130-150 Amps, then 0.8mm wire may be more suitable to the output range of your machine.
But all the same, we often find that operators who previously thought they had to use 0.8mm are pleasantly suprised to find that our Platinum GL-11 in 0.9mm does everything their previous 0.8mm wire did and more.
- Try 0.9mm, you may be pleasantly suprised with results on thinner materials!
- Don't settle for a sub-standard wire - use a premium gasless wire such as Platinum GL-11
This blog is intended to help with: What is the best size gasless wire to use on thin steel or gal (galvanised) steel? // What size gasless wire should i use?
While all care has been taken, Weldclass accepts no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions in this information or links and attachments. Any comments, suggestions & recommendations are of a general nature only and may not apply to particular applications. It is the sole responsibility of the user and/or operator to select the appropriate product for their intended purpose and to ensure that the product selected is capable of performing correctly and safely in the intended application. E.&O.E.
Date: 08-03-2022Weldclass Weldclass
Date: 07-03-2022Cedrick B Titus
Date: 08-06-2020Eric Mapes nil
Date: 08-05-2020Weldclass Weldclass
Date: 14-11-2017Brent sheehan B&B Sheehan
Please note: Spam comments (or attempts to create backlinks) will be DELETED and will NOT be published.